The BI Survey 8 - Table of contents
To return to the Product Overview, http://www.beyesurvey.com/test/product-overview.html target="_top" class="internal-link" >click here
1 | Introduction | 1 |
1.1 | Executive summary | 1 |
1.2 | Vendor independence | 3 |
1.3 | Key findings | 4 |
1.3.1 | The market | 4 |
1.3.2 | The selection process | 5 |
1.3.3 | Achievement of business goals | 6 |
1.3.4 | Realizing business benefits | 7 |
1.3.5 | The power of the mega vendors | 8 |
1.3.6 | Applications | 9 |
1.3.7 | Products | 10 |
1.3.8 | Purchases | 11 |
1.3.9 | Cost of ownership | 12 |
1.3.10 | Customer loyalty | 12 |
1.3.11 | Platforms | 13 |
1.3.12 | Data sources | 14 |
1.3.13 | Data volumes | 15 |
1.3.14 | Implementation and rollout | 15 |
1.3.15 | Deployment issues and problems | 16 |
1.3.16 | Performance issues | 17 |
1.3.17 | Web BI | 18 |
1.3.18 | Vendor vs customer and consultant perceptions | 19 |
1.4 | Charting conventions | 21 |
1.5 | Means, medians, quartiles and modes | 22 |
|
|
|
2 | The sample | 25 |
2.1 | Objectives | 25 |
2.1.1 | Large sample | 25 |
2.1.2 | Well-distributed | 26 |
2.1.3 | Unbiased | 26 |
2.2 | Sample size and make-up | 27 |
2.3 | BI buyers compared with non-buyers | 29 |
2.4 | Respondents' perspectives | 30 |
2.5 | Geographic distribution | 34 |
2.6 | Organization sizes by revenue | 37 |
2.7 | Organization sizes by headcount | 38 |
2.8 | Customer organization sizes | 39 |
2.9 | Vertical markets | 41 |
|
|
|
3 | Products included | 44 |
3.1 | Product list | 44 |
3.2 | Augmented samples | 46 |
3.3 | Vendor notes | 47 |
3.3.1 | Actuate | 48 |
3.3.2 | arcplan | 48 |
3.3.3 | Board | 48 |
3.3.4 | Business Objects (SAP) | 49 |
3.3.5 | Cognos (IBM) | 49 |
3.3.6 | Cubeware | 50 |
3.3.7 | Hyperion (Oracle) | 50 |
3.3.8 | Infor | 51 |
3.3.9 | Information Builders | 51 |
3.3.10 | LogiXML | 51 |
3.3.11 | Microsoft | 51 |
3.3.12 | MicroStrategy | 52 |
3.3.13 | MIK | 52 |
3.3.14 | Oracle | 52 |
3.3.15 | Open source | 53 |
3.3.16 | QlikTech | 53 |
3.3.17 | SAP | 53 |
3.3.18 | Targit | 56 |
|
|
|
4 | Age profiles | 57 |
4.1 | Product age profiles | 58 |
4.2 | Changing product shares | 62 |
|
|
|
5 | The Business Benefits Index | 63 |
5.1 | Business benefits enjoyed | 63 |
5.2 | The Business Benefits Index | 66 |
5.3 | Business benefits trends | 66 |
|
|
|
6 | The purchase cycle | 68 |
6.1 | What influences the evaluation list? | 68 |
6.1.1 | Influences by role | 69 |
6.1.2 | Influences by product evaluated | 70 |
6.1.3 | Influences by application characteristics | 72 |
6.1.4 | Influences by organization demographics | 74 |
6.2 | The benefits of conducting a formal evaluation | 75 |
6.3 | Why organizations choose products | 79 |
6.3.1 | Reasons for product selection, by product ... | 83 |
6.4 | ... and how they should have chosen | 87 |
6.5 | Vendor vs customer perceptions | 91 |
6.6 | License fees | 91 |
6.6.1 | License fees by respondents' roles | 94 |
6.6.2 | License fees by product | 94 |
6.6.3 | License fees by evaluation method | 95 |
6.6.4 | License fees by breadth of deployment and platform | 96 |
6.6.5 | License fees by deterrents to wider deployment | 97 |
6.6.6 | License fees by implementation characteristics | 98 |
6.6.7 | License fees by data characteristics | 99 |
6.6.8 | License fees by organization demography | 100 |
6.7 | Do you get what you pay for? | 101 |
|
|
|
7 | The BI ownership experience | 104 |
7.1 | Proportion of employees regularly using BI | 104 |
7.1.1 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by respondent role | 105 |
7.1.2 | The vendor vs the user perception of breadth of deployment | 106 |
7.1.3 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by product | 107 |
7.1.4 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by age and selection methods | 109 |
7.1.5 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by license fees and platform | 110 |
7.1.6 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by problem areas | 111 |
7.1.7 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by implementation factors | 112 |
7.1.8 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by applications and user departments | 113 |
7.1.9 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by customer size and vertical market | 116 |
7.1.10 | Breadth of deployment analyzed by parent organization geography | 117 |
7.2 | Departments using BI | 118 |
7.2.1 | Departments using BI, analyzed by respondents' roles | 119 |
7.2.2 | Departments using BI, analyzed by product | 119 |
7.2.3 | Departments using BI, analyzed by customer demographics | 121 |
7.3 | Resources used to run and administer BI projects | 123 |
7.4 | Business goals achieved | 126 |
7.4.1 | Goal achievement levels, analyzed by respondents' roles | 127 |
7.4.2 | Business goals achieved, analyzed by product and vendor | 128 |
7.4.3 | Business goals achieved, analyzed by age and evaluation methods | 131 |
7.4.4 | Business goals achieved, analyzed by implementation factors | 133 |
7.4.5 | Business goals achieved, analyzed by organization demographics | 134 |
7.5 | Analyzing product goal achievement over time | 136 |
7.6 | Business benefits achieved | 137 |
7.6.1 | Benefits analyzed by respondents' roles | 137 |
7.6.2 | Benefits analyzed by product and vendor | 138 |
7.6.3 | Benefits analyzed by application age | 140 |
7.6.4 | Benefits analyzed by evaluation methods | 141 |
7.6.5 | Benefits analyzed by license fees, breadth of deployment, platform | 142 |
7.6.6 | Benefits analyzed by Web deployment rates | 143 |
7.6.7 | Benefits analyzed by implementers | 144 |
7.6.8 | Benefits analyzed by implementation time | 145 |
7.6.9 | Benefits analyzed by support quality | 146 |
7.6.10 | Benefits analyzed by customer demography | 146 |
7.7 | The Cost of Ownership Index | 149 |
|
|
|
8 | Vendor effectiveness | 151 |
8.1 | Vendor marketing effectiveness | 151 |
8.1.1 | Getting on the evaluation list | 151 |
8.1.2 | Short-listing trend | 156 |
8.1.3 | Avoiding competitive evaluations | 158 |
8.2 | Vendor self-perception | 160 |
8.3 | Sales success: winners and losers | 164 |
8.3.1 | Win rates by evaluation type | 166 |
8.3.2 | Win rate trends | 167 |
8.3.3 | Win rates by organization size | 169 |
8.3.4 | Win rates by organization location | 171 |
8.4 | Buyer demographics | 173 |
8.5 | Licenses purchased | 175 |
8.6 | Deployed seats | 178 |
8.7 | Prevalence rates | 180 |
8.8 | Shelfware | 182 |
8.9 | Likelihood of using all purchased seats within a year | 186 |
8.10 | Future buying intentions | 187 |
8.11 | Product support | 191 |
8.11.1 | Product support methods | 191 |
8.11.2 | Overall support scores and trend | 198 |
8.11.3 | Support ratings by resource and role | 199 |
8.11.4 | Comparing vendor product support performance | 201 |
8.11.5 | Is big beautiful where product support is concerned? | 205 |
8.11.6 | Comparing support scores by site age and selection method | 206 |
8.11.7 | Do big customers get better product support? | 207 |
8.11.8 | Regional analysis of product support quality | 209 |
8.12 | Customer loyalty | 210 |
8.12.1 | Product abandonment | 211 |
8.12.2 | Which would they standardize on? | 213 |
8.12.3 | Reasons for standardization | 216 |
8.12.4 | The loyalty league table | 219 |
8.12.5 | Loyalty trends | 222 |
|
|
|
9 | Implementation | 224 |
9.1 | Implementers | 224 |
9.1.1 | Implementation mix by respondents' roles | 225 |
9.1.2 | Implementation mix by product | 226 |
9.1.3 | Implementation mix by application characteristics | 227 |
9.1.4 | Implementation mix by organization demographics | 228 |
9.2 | External consulting spend | 229 |
9.2.1 | External fees by respondents' roles | 231 |
9.2.2 | External fees by product and suite | 232 |
9.2.3 | External consulting fees by application characteristics | 233 |
9.2.4 | External fees by organization demography | 236 |
9.3 | Do you get what you pay for? | 237 |
9.4 | Which implementer is the most successful? | 238 |
|
|
|
10 | Timescales | 240 |
10.1 | Effect on success rates as rollout times grow | 241 |
10.2 | Reported roll-out times by respondent role | 244 |
10.3 | Reported rollout times by product and suite | 244 |
10.4 | Reported rollout times by implementation factors | 245 |
10.5 | Reported rollout times by organization demographics | 247 |
10.6 | Rolled out within three or six months | 248 |
10.7 | Implementation times conclusions | 249 |
|
|
|
11 | What goes wrong? | 251 |
11.1 | Problems encountered | 251 |
11.2 | People problems | 258 |
11.3 | Data problems | 262 |
11.4 | Product-related technical problems | 265 |
11.4.1 | Product-related problems analyzed by respondent role | 265 |
11.4.2 | Product-related problems analyzed by product | 266 |
11.4.3 | Product-related problems analyzed by mode and age | 269 |
11.4.4 | Product-related problems analyzed by product selection criteria used | 270 |
11.4.5 | Product-related problems analyzed by deal size and platform | 272 |
11.4.6 | Product-related problems analyzed by implementation factors | 273 |
11.4.7 | Product-related problems analyzed by query times and data volumes | 276 |
11.5 | Normalized product-related problem analysis | 277 |
11.6 | The problem mix in perspective | 281 |
11.7 | Deterrents to wider deployment | 288 |
11.7.1 | Deterrents analyzed by product | 290 |
11.7.2 | Barriers analyzed by selection methods | 292 |
11.7.3 | Barriers analyzed by lead implementer and implementation time | 294 |
11.7.4 | No deterrents to wider deployment rankings | 295 |
|
|
|
12 | Applications | 297 |
12.1 | Applications by role and industry analyst | 298 |
12.2 | Applications by product | 298 |
12.3 | Applications by selection methods | 301 |
12.4 | Applications by license fees, breadth and platform | 302 |
12.5 | Applications by implementation factors | 303 |
12.6 | Applications by data volumes | 306 |
12.7 | Applications by organization demographics | 306 |
|
|
|
13 | Web BI | 308 |
13.1 | Web deployment trends | 308 |
13.2 | Web deployment rates by respondent and organization | 311 |
13.3 | Web deployment rates by product and suite | 312 |
13.4 | Web deployment rates by selection and implementation factors | 314 |
13.5 | Web deployment rates by query time and data volume | 315 |
13.6 | Web deployment trends by product since 2002 | 316 |
13.7 | Effects of Web deployment on business success | 317 |
13.8 | Extranet usage | 319 |
13.8.1 | Extranet deployment rates | 319 |
13.8.2 | Extranet deployment trends | 320 |
13.8.3 | Extranet deployment by respondent and organization type | 322 |
13.8.4 | Extranet deployment by product | 323 |
13.8.5 | Extranet deployment by deployment aspects | 325 |
13.8.6 | Extranet target users | 326 |
13.9 | Browsers used for BI deployments | 329 |
13.10 | Preferred BI Web architectures | 333 |
|
|
|
14 | Server platforms | 340 |
14.1 | Server platform trend | 340 |
14.2 | Server platforms by respondent and organization | 344 |
14.3 | Server platforms by product and vendor | 346 |
14.4 | Server platforms by purchase factors | 348 |
14.5 | Server platforms by implementation factor | 349 |
14.6 | Does the server platform affect business success? | 350 |
14.7 | The rise of 64-bit BI | 351 |
|
|
|
15 | Client/server combos | 354 |
15.1 | Client tools used with 'open' OLAP servers | 354 |
15.1.1 | Analysis Services client tools | 355 |
15.1.2 | Essbase client tools | 357 |
15.1.3 | SAP BI/BW client tools | 358 |
15.1.4 | TM1 client tools | 360 |
15.1.5 | Comparing the server tools markets | 361 |
15.2 | BI data sources | 361 |
15.2.1 | Data sources accessed by Actuate | 362 |
15.2.2 | Data sources accessed by arcplan | 363 |
15.2.3 | Data sources accessed by Bissantz client tools | 363 |
15.2.4 | Data sources accessed by Business Objects (SAP) client tools | 364 |
15.2.5 | Data sources accessed by Cognos client tools | 365 |
15.2.6 | Data sources accessed by Cubeware Cockpit | 366 |
15.2.7 | Data sources accessed by Information Builders WebFOCUS | 366 |
15.2.8 | Data sources accessed by Microsoft BI client tools | 367 |
15.2.9 | Data sources accessed by Panorama | 368 |
15.2.10 | Comparing the number of data sources accessed by BI client tools | 368 |
|
|
|
16 | Source databases | 370 |
16.1 | Source databases | 370 |
16.1.1 | Source database trends | 371 |
16.2 | Data source mix by input data volumes | 372 |
16.3 | Data source mix by product and vendor | 375 |
16.4 | Data source mix analyzed by other factors | 377 |
16.5 | Most popular BI tools used with major databases | 379 |
16.5.1 | The Microsoft database BI league tables | 379 |
16.5.2 | The Oracle database BI league tables | 380 |
16.5.3 | The IBM database BI league tables | 381 |
16.5.4 | The open source database BI league tables | 382 |
16.5.5 | The Teradata BI league tables | 383 |
16.5.6 | The flat files BI league tables | 384 |
16.5.7 | The BI league table in sites performing manual data entry | 385 |
|
|
|
17 | Data volumes | 387 |
17.1 | Overall data volumes | 388 |
17.1.1 | Data volume trends | 389 |
17.2 | Data volumes analyzed | 390 |
17.2.1 | By respondents' roles | 391 |
17.2.2 | By product and suite | 391 |
17.2.3 | By deployment factors | 394 |
17.2.4 | By platform | 395 |
17.2.5 | By implementation factors | 396 |
17.2.6 | By industry | 397 |
17.2.7 | By customer demographics | 398 |
17.3 | Is bigger better? | 399 |
|
|
|
18 | Performance at the speed of thought? | 401 |
18.1 | Does query performance impact business benefits? | 402 |
18.2 | How do you measure performance? | 405 |
18.3 | Reported query times | 407 |
18.3.1 | Query times by respondent type and input data volumes | 408 |
18.3.2 | Query times by product and selection method | 409 |
18.3.3 | Query times by platform and extent of Web deployment | 412 |
18.4 | Query times vs input data volume | 413 |
18.5 | Complaints about poor query performance | 415 |
18.6 | Query performance complaints trend | 417 |
18.7 | Poor performance deterring wider deployment | 420 |
18.8 | Data latency: load, build and pre-calculate times | 422 |
18.9 | Does latency affect business benefits? | 422 |
18.10 | Data latency analyzed | 423 |
18.11 | Data latency vs input data volume | 428 |
|
|
|
19 | The customers' verdict dashboards | 431 |
19.1 | Root KPIs | 432 |
19.1.1 | Business Benefits Index | 433 |
19.1.2 | Goal achievement, adjusted for age | 434 |
19.1.3 | Competitive win rate | 435 |
19.1.4 | Selection based on product factors | 436 |
19.1.5 | Prevalence rates in multi-product sites | 437 |
19.1.6 | Standardization preferences | 438 |
19.1.7 | Intention to buy more licenses | 439 |
19.1.8 | Discontinued usage rates | 440 |
19.1.9 | Proportion of employees using product | 441 |
19.1.10 | Range of applications deployed | 442 |
19.1.11 | Number of departments served | 443 |
19.1.12 | Deployed seats | 444 |
19.1.13 | Data volumes (log) | 445 |
19.1.14 | Cost of Ownership Index | 446 |
19.1.15 | Deployed seats per administrator head | 447 |
19.1.16 | Implemented within three months | 448 |
19.1.17 | Product-related problems | 449 |
19.1.18 | Product-related deterrents to wider deployment | 450 |
19.1.19 | Product reliability | 451 |
19.1.20 | Product support quality | 452 |
19.1.21 | Query performance complaints | 453 |
19.1.22 | Query performance, adjusted for data volumes | 454 |
19.1.23 | Data latency, adjusted for data volumes | 455 |
19.1.24 | Data latency as a deterrent to wider deployment | 456 |
19.1.25 | Web deployment (>50 percent Web) | 457 |
19.1.26 | Extranets deployed | 458 |
19.2 | Aggregated KPIs | 458 |
19.2.1 | Business achievement KPIs | 459 |
19.2.2 | Costs KPIs | 460 |
19.2.3 | Scalability KPIs | 461 |
19.2.4 | Quality and support KPIs | 462 |
19.2.5 | Performance KPIs | 463 |
19.2.6 | Loyalty KPIs | 464 |
19.2.7 | Web KPIs | 465 |
19.3 | Overall KPI score | 466 |
19.4 | Product dashboards | 466 |
19.4.1 | Actuate Platform KPI dashboard | 467 |
19.4.2 | arcplan KPI dashboard | 468 |
19.4.3 | Bissantz KPI dashboard | 469 |
19.4.4 | Board KPI dashboard | 470 |
19.4.5 | BusinessObjects KPI dashboard | 471 |
19.4.6 | Cognos Analysis KPI dashboard | 472 |
19.4.7 | Cognos Reporting KPI dashboard | 473 |
19.4.8 | Cognos TM1 Server KPI dashboard | 474 |
19.4.9 | Crystal Reports KPI dashboard | 475 |
19.4.10 | Cubeware Cockpit KPI dashboard | 476 |
19.4.11 | Hyperion Essbase KPI dashboard | 477 |
19.4.12 | Infor PM OLAP KPI dashboard | 478 |
19.4.13 | Microsoft Analysis Services KPI dashboard | 479 |
19.4.14 | Microsoft Excel PivotTables KPI dashboard | 480 |
19.4.15 | Microsoft Reporting Services KPI dashboard | 481 |
19.4.16 | MicroStrategy KPI dashboard | 482 |
19.4.17 | MIK KPI dashboard | 483 |
19.4.18 | Oracle BIEE/BISEO KPI dashboard | 484 |
19.4.19 | Panorama KPI dashboard | 485 |
19.4.20 | QlikTech QlikView KPI dashboard | 486 |
19.4.21 | SAP BI/BW KPI dashboard | 487 |
19.4.22 | Targit KPI dashboard | 488 |
19.4.23 | WebFOCUS KPI dashboard | 489 |
|
|
|
20 | Appendix: Survey questionnaire | 490 |

